Ethical review of AI uses
I identify where AI influences content, decisions, people or recommendations. You leave with key risks, possible biases and limits to set.
Explore the AI reviewUse AI with better human judgement. I help small teams spot bias, question AI outputs and set human validation rules before AI affects people, decisions or public-facing content.
These formats help your team identify ethical watch points, question AI-generated outputs and define clear limits for responsible AI use.
I identify where AI influences content, decisions, people or recommendations. You leave with key risks, possible biases and limits to set.
Explore the AI reviewI review and rewrite prompts to reduce vague instructions, limit blind spots and better frame the answers produced by AI.
Review promptsYour team learns to spot bias, question AI outputs and strengthen human validation habits using concrete examples.
View the workshopI work at your pace to set limits, clarify responsibilities and build ethical AI practices adapted to your context.
See ongoing supportI review real situations with your team to identify ethical risks, possible bias and limits to apply before AI outputs are used.
I help your team locate the moments where AI may influence a person, a decision, a communication, an analysis or a recommendation.
Risk contextI help you review possible bias, weak information, hallucinations, stereotypes, missing context and excessive confidence.
Output reviewI help you distinguish acceptable uses, outputs to check, decisions that must remain human and situations where AI should not be used.
Usage limitsYou leave with simple deliverables: reviewed prompts, a vigilance grid, usage rules, workshop material or practical recommendations.
Clear next stepsThis support is designed for organisations where AI outputs can influence people, decisions, communication, analysis or trust.
You use AI in your activity and want simple, understandable and applicable rules for your team.
You use AI to write, sort, structure or prepare decisions. You want to reduce bias before it influences your choices.
You create content with AI. You want to avoid stereotypes, verify outputs and keep human validation clear.
You want to use AI without losing transparency, responsibility or alignment with your values.
AI can produce quick and convincing answers. It can also amplify bias, hide uncertainty or make a fragile output sound authoritative.
An AI output may sound fluent and logical while containing a blind spot, stereotype or incomplete representation.
AI can help prepare, structure or rewrite. Decisions that affect people must remain under human responsibility.
A vague or leading prompt can produce an answer that is biased, overconfident or poorly adapted to the context.
A team uses AI more responsibly when it knows what to check, when to ask for human validation and which limits to respect.
Prompt & Pulse is led by Dieneba LESDEMA, an independent ethical AI consultant with international corporate experience and a practical approach to bias, prompts and human validation.
I support small organisations that want to use AI with better judgement, without adopting a heavy or purely technical framework.
My work focuses on possible bias, outputs to question, decisions not to delegate, human validation and clear limits for AI use.
These external resources help frame responsible AI discussions. They are useful references, not a substitute for legal advice.
The EU AI Act applies progressively, with different dates for prohibited practices, general-purpose AI and other obligations.
View the official timeline →The French data protection authority provides practical resources on AI, data protection and GDPR watch points.
Read CNIL AI resources →A widely used framework for mapping, measuring and managing AI risks across real-world contexts.
Explore the NIST AI RMF →Algorithmic bias is a systematic distortion in an output produced by an AI system. It can come from data, prompts, criteria, context or the way the result is interpreted.
AI can influence content, choices, decisions and interactions with people. Even in a small team, it is useful to define what AI can support, what must be checked and what should remain human.
Yes, when relevant. If AI is used for hiring, evaluation, scoring or decisions that affect people, stronger vigilance may be needed. This support helps identify ethical and practical points of attention, without replacing formal legal advice.
No. Prompt & Pulse mainly supports SMEs, small teams, independent professionals, associations and organisations that want to use AI with better judgement.
Compliance focuses on legal obligations such as GDPR or the EU AI Act. AI ethics looks more broadly at the real impact of AI on people, decisions, practices, trust and human responsibility.
It depends on the format. A first review can take a few weeks. A prompt review can be shorter. A bias workshop can run over half a day or one day. Longer support is built around the team’s needs and pace.
Start with a simple conversation. You explain your context, your questions and the situations that concern you. I help identify the first ethical watch points.
Need more information?